Ken Wilbur brings up the notion of 2 main figures of spiritual evolution:
On one hand their is the transcendent Buddha, the sage of the Tao, the Yogi on the mountaintop - one who is beyond the wheel of suffering.
an on the other hand is the Bodhisattva, the Christ, who has compassion for all in the wheel of suffering, who suffers themselves in order to help myriad beings.
both are real, and neither can be ignored.
the transcendent is yin energy, it emphasizes that all is well in the universe regardless of how we use our agency. it is accepting, receptive, resonating with the light of the infinite. it says "is all not one? what could i do that is not already done?"
and the compassionate figure emphasizes the yang, the agency that we have as sentient beings; how to hold and express love and empathy for all beings, how to help them transcend the suffering of life so they can go beyond the beyond. how to enable them to have access and awareness of their innate perfection that the transcendent Buddha is conscious of. To free their lives of what stands in their way of realizing the Grand Perfection.
This applies to daily life in that one can integrate both figures into praxis. Why should anyone fret about whether their personal agency is effective if all is as It should be? Simultaneously, the Universe is giving you this opportunity to expand, evolve and utilize free will, and it would be a waste not to use it.
I wasn't given a working body and a talented mind so i could be absent from all affairs. But that doesnt mean i need to be wrapped up in worldly affairs to the point where I feel negative emotions, and damage my body from stress.
In fact, the more aware one is of the "Buddha I" in their moment to moment consciousness, the easier it becomes to bear the slings and arrows of a worldly existence dedicated to the aid of others.
Make sense?
Its a win win situation. The Grand Perfection manifest.
As Wilbur puts it "hurts more, bothers you less"